Microbial contamination of two non-sterile latex examination glove brands marketed in Trujillo, Peru: a laboratory study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64716/htmpv670Keywords:
Gloves, Protective, Equipment Contamination, Cross Infection, Bacteria, DentistryAbstract
Introduction: Non-sterile latex examination gloves are routinely used as barrier protection in dental practice; however, microbial contamination may be present before clinical use and potentially compromise infection-control procedures. Objective: To compare the microbial contamination of two brands of non-sterile latex examination gloves marketed in Trujillo, Peru. Methods: A comparative laboratory study was conducted using 132 unused latex examination gloves, including 66 Endoglove and 66 BeeSure specimens. Gloves were aseptically removed from their original boxes and processed individually using a microbiological rinse procedure followed by incubation and culture. Microbial growth was quantified as colony-forming units (CFU), and recovered microorganisms were classified according to the laboratory identification. Results: Endoglove specimens yielded 95 CFU and BeeSure specimens 80 CFU. Overall, Klebsiella was the most frequently recovered bacterium (47 CFU; 26.86%), followed by Salmonella (38 CFU; 21.71%), enterococci (25 CFU; 14.29%), Staphylococcus epidermidis (21 CFU; 12.00%), yeasts (17 CFU; 9.71%), Staphylococcus aureus (14 CFU; 8.00%), and Staphylococcus saprophyticus (13 CFU; 7.43%). Conclusions: Microbial contamination was detected in unused non-sterile latex examination gloves from both brands, with a higher total CFU count in Endoglove than in BeeSure. Bacterial species predominated among the recovered microorganisms, particularly Klebsiella and Salmonella.
Downloads
References
FDI World Dental Federation. Infection prevention and control in dental practice. Int Dent J. 2022;72(1):16-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2021.11.010
Ling ML, Ching P, Cheng J, Lang L, Liberali S, Poon P, et al. APSIC dental infection prevention and control (IPC) guidelines. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2023;12(1):53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-023-01252-w
Freitas J, Lomba A, Sousa S, Gonçalves V, Brois P, Nunes E, et al. Consensus-based guidelines for best practices in the selection and use of examination gloves in healthcare settings. Nurs Rep. 2025;15(1):9. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15010009
Paul G, Bobic R, Dawud J, Ertelt K, Fluhr M, Harms G, et al. Bacterial contamination of nonsterile gloves versus hands after hand hygiene. Am J Infect Control. 2021;49(11):1392-1394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2021.04.002
Cabeau C, Bolle-Reddat R, Hauschild J, McDonnell G. Non-sterile gloves as a source of radiation-tolerant microorganisms. Microorganisms. 2023;11(12):2859. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11122859
Hughes KA, Cornwall J, Theis JC, Brooks HJL. Bacterial contamination of unused, disposable non-sterile gloves on a hospital orthopaedic ward. Australas Med J. 2013;6(6):331-338. https://doi.org/10.4066/AMJ.2013.1675
Rose TR, Shah N, Juarez F, Filip-Bermudez V, Gomez GJ. A novel glove box design decreases glove box surface contamination and glove waste. J Hosp Infect. 2025;162:207-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2025.05.009
Krithikadatta J, Gopikrishna V, Datta M. CRIS Guidelines (Checklist for Reporting In-vitro Studies): a concept note on the need for standardized guidelines for improving quality and transparency in reporting in-vitro studies in experimental dental research. J Conserv Dent. 2014;17(4):301-304. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.136338
Alqumber MAA. Unused non-sterile latex disposable gloves contamination with healthcare-associated bacteria and contamination reduction by reminder signs. Egypt Acad J Biol Sci C Physiol Mol Biol. 2021;13(1):1-12. https://doi.org/10.21608/eajbsc.2021.136293
Helmi M, Albagieh HN, Alrasheed RS, Aldosary RM, Alsulaim TM. Contamination level of unused gloves in King Saud University dental clinics. Medical Science. 2022;26:ms28e2047. https://doi.org/10.54905/disssi/v26i119/ms28e2047
Price L, Gozdzielewska L, Matuluko A, Pittet D, Allegranzi B, Reilly J. Comparing the effectiveness of hand hygiene techniques in reducing the microbial load and covering hand surfaces in healthcare workers: updated systematic review. Am J Infect Control. 2022;50(10):1079-1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2022.02.003
Glowicz JB, Landon E, Sickbert-Bennett EE, Aiello AE, deKay K, Hoffmann KK, et al. SHEA/IDSA/APIC practice recommendation: strategies to prevent healthcare-associated infections through hand hygiene: 2022 update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023;44(3):355-376. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2022.304
Machado MB, Oliveira VC, Domingues PCA, Monteiro RM, Dos Santos AP, Bim LL, et al. Unveiling the efficacy of latex gloves in preventing viral infections during needlestick injuries: an in vitro mixed-methods study. Infect Dis Health. 2024;29(2):65-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2023.10.001
Kristiansen PC, Bastien S, Debesay J, Fagernes M. How and why do healthcare workers use gloves in two Norwegian nursing homes? J Hosp Infect. 2024;146:134-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2024.02.005
Adediran TY, Robinson GL, Johnson JK, Liang Y, Bejo S, Leekha S, et al. Factors associated with patient-to-healthcare personnel (HCP) and HCP-to-subsequent patient transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2024;45(5):583-589. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2023.269
Lee JY, Yun SH, Kang JW, Kong GM. Bacterial contamination of surgical gloves during clean orthopedic surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2024;45(8):991-993. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2024.49
Lee MK, Kim N, Jo HJ, Bang JH, Park SW, Lee E. Risk of microbial transmission by reusing gloves after alcohol-based hand hygiene. J Hosp Infect. 2023;135:171-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2023.01.025
O'Hara LM, Pineles L, Newman M, Bahr-Robertson M, Baracco GJ, Goetz MB, et al. Factors associated with healthcare personnel glove or gown contamination with MRSA: a cohort study of VA hospitals in 5 states. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2025;46(11):1105-1109. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2025.10253
Saffar MMA, Krabbendam E, Wolvius EB, van der Tas JT. Sterile versus non-sterile gloves in dental extractions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2026;19(1):6. https://doi.org/10.3390/cmtr19010006
Kramer TS, Brodzinski A, Paul M, Drexler H, Scheithauer S, Geffers C. The use of single-use medical gloves in doctors' practices and hospitals. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2024;121(21):715-724. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0159
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
The dataset is available upon request. The aggregated data supporting the findings of this study are presented in full in the manuscript and its accompanying tables.
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Manuel Ángel García-Polo (Autor/a)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their work and grant TUMI Oral Health the right of first publication. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
